Skip to content
PM Certification

Additive Manufacturing Tutorial

5 (100%) 6 votes

Hi Friend, in this Additive Manufacturing Tutorial you are going to learn everything you need to know about Additive Manufacturing. Keep reading!



Additive manufacturing, also known as 3D printing, rapid prototyping or freeform fabrication, is ‘the process of joining materials to make objects from 3D model data, usually layer upon layer, as opposed to subtractive manufacturing methodologies’ such as machining.

The use of Additive Manufacturing (AM) with metal powders is a new and growing industry sector with many of its leading companies based in Europe. It became a suitable process to produce complex metal net shape parts, and not only prototypes, as before.

Additive manufacturing now enables both a design and industrial revolution, in various industrial sectors such as aerospace, energy, automotive, medical, tooling and consumer goods.


According to the ASTM standard F2792-10, additive manufacturing is the « process of joining materials to make objects from 3D model data, usually layer upon layer, as opposed to subtractive manufacturing methodologies, such as traditional machining.” Additive manufacturing technologies for metals are numerous, hence the development of a wide variety of terms and acronyms, as can be seen in the graph below. But today additive manufacturing is the most common term in industry markets while 3D printing is more used in the consumer market.

Positioning of AM vs. other PM technologies

Additive manufacturing is complementing other powder metallurgy (PM) technologies.

Like Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP), AM is more suitable for the production of small or medium series of parts. While the HIP process is generally used for the manufacturing of massive near net shape parts of several hundred kilograms, the AM process is more suitable for smaller parts of a few kilos and it offers an improved capacity to produce complex metal parts thanks to greater design freedom.

Metal Injection Moulding (MIM) and press & sintering technologies also offer the possibility to produce net shape parts but they are recommended for large series of small parts.

The benefits of AM technology

Metal additive manufacturing technologies offer many key benefits.

Increased design freedom versus conventional casting and machining

Lightweight structures, made possible either by the use of lattice design or by designing parts where the material is only where it needs to be, without other constraints

New functions such as complex internal channels or several parts built in one

Net shape process meaningless raw material consumption, up to 25 times less versus machining, important in the case of expensive or difficult to machine alloys. The net shape capability helps to create complex parts in one step only thus reducing the number of assembly operations such as welding, brazing.

No tools needed, unlike other conventional metallurgy processes which require molds and metal forming or removal tools

Short production cycle time: complex parts can be produced layer by layer in a few hours in additive machines. The total cycle time including post-processing usually amounts to a few days or weeks and it is usually much shorter than conventional metallurgy processes which often require production cycles of several months. The process is recommended for the production of parts in small series

The limits of AM technology

To take full advantage of AM technologies, it is important to be aware of some limitations:

Part size: In the case of powder bed technology, the part size is limited to powder bed size, such as 250x250x250 mm for standard powder bed systems. However, part sizes can be greater with direct energy deposition (or laser metal deposition) processes. But, due to the low thickness of powder layers, it can be very slow and costly building high parts or massive parts.

Production series: the AM processes are generally suitable for unitary or small series and is not relevant for mass production. But progress are made to increase machine productivity and thus the production of larger series. For small sized parts, series up to 25000 parts/year are already possible.

Part design: in the case of powder bed technology, removable support structures are needed when the overhang angle is below 45°. Other design considerations to be taken into account can be seen in chapter 4 about design guidelines.

Material choice: though many alloys are available, non-weldable metals cannot be processed by additive manufacturing and difficult-to-weld alloys require specific approaches.

Material properties: parts made by additive manufacturing tend to show anisotropy in the Z axis (construction direction).

Besides, though densities of 99.9% can be reached, there can be some residual internal porosities. Mechanical properties are usually superior to cast parts but in general inferior to wrought parts.

 Market perspectives

The use of additive manufacturing technology is developing in many industries:



medical, in particular in surgical implants and dental applications

tooling in particular for plastics processing

automotive and transportation

consumer goods


AM technology is no longer used only for prototyping but now also for metal part production, hence the strong growth since 2012 of AM systems sales for the production of metal parts (see graph below).

In addition, the current market growth should have a positive impact on the cost competitiveness of AM technology. Indeed, according to a DMRC survey in 2013 with interviews of 75 AM experts, it is expected that machine build speed should at least quadruple by 2018.

Besides, increasing metal powder production capacity for additive manufacturing might reduce powder costs too. However, machine utilization is expected to drop slightly due to multiple laser scanners and rising complexity. And the increase in build rate can be limited by the part’s geometry (e.g. wall thickness).

Additive manufacturing technologies

The basics of laser melting with metal powders

During laser beam melting, the laser beam, with a diameter such as 100 µm, will locally melt the upper powder layer on the powder bed. The laser will be partially absorbed by metal powder particles, creating a melt pool which solidifies rapidly. Laser power typically varies from 200 W up to 1000 W.

In selective laser melting, different scanning strategies are possible. The laser scanning patterns will influence porosity level, microstructure, surface roughness and heat build-up in the finished the metal components. The stripe pattern is a band defined by the scan vector width (ie stripe width), the hatching space between adjacent tracks and the scan direction as well as the overlap with the neighboring stripes.

Overview of metal additive manufacturing processes

In beam-based powder bed systems (LBM or EBM), a powder layer is first applied on a building platform. Then a laser or electron beam selectively melts the upper layer of powder.

After melting, the platform is lowered and the cycle is repeated until the part is fully built, embedded in the powder bed.

Laser Beam Melting (or Selective Laser Melting)

In the laser beam melting process, a powder layer is first applied on a building platform with a recoater (blade or roller) and a laser beam selectively melts the layer of powder. Then the platform is lowered by 20 up to 100 µm and a new powder layer is applied. The laser beam melting operation is repeated. After a few thousand cycles (depending on the height of the part), the built part is removed from the powder bed.

3D printing

The 3D printing process is an indirect process in two steps.

After applying a powder layer on the build platform, the powder is agglomerated thanks to a binder fed through the printer nozzle.

The operation is repeated until parts are produced, which shall be then removed carefully from the powder bed, as they are in a « green » stage.

The metal part solidification takes place in a second step, during a debinding and sintering operation, sometimes followed by an infiltration step.

The 3D printing technology is more productive than laser beam melting and requires no support structure. Besides it provides a good surface quality by using one of several post-processing techniques:

Peening/Blasting/Tumbling for an average of Ra 3.0 µm

Superfinishing for an average of Ra 1.0 μm down to < 1.0μm

But the range of available materials is limited and mechanical properties achieved can be lower than with laser and electron beam melting.

Direct Energy Deposition (or Laser metal deposition)

With the direct energy deposition process, a nozzle mounted on a multi-axis arm deposit melted material onto the specified surface, where it solidifies.

This technology offers higher productivity than selective laser melting and also the ability to produce larger parts, but the freedom in design is much more limited: for instance, lattice structures and internal channels are not possible.

Benefits of Direct Energy Deposition process

New topological features possibilities

Repair of parts that up to now were impossible

Addition of functionalities on existing parts with either the same or a different material

No dimensional limits (apart from the machine size)

Excellent metallurgic quality at least as good as foundry

Control of the material deposited (gradients, multi-materials, monolithic …) Eco-innovative process: less material loss, no tool process…

Main process steps

The manufacturing of a metal part with additive manufacturing technologies starts with 3D modeling. Then data preparation shall be organized for and includes the definition of part orientation, the positioning of support structures and the slicing of the model. After part of manufacturing, post-processing operations are needed.

Post-processing operations can include:



Peening, Grinding,

Polishing, surface treatment

Heat treatment

Hot isostatic pressing (HIP) to eliminate residual porosities


Metal powders for additive manufacturing


Metal powder plays a very important role in additive manufacturing processes. Indeed the quality of metal powder used will have a major influence on mechanical properties but it can also influence:

the build-to-build consistency,

the reproducibility between AM machines,

the production of defect-free components,

the manufacturing defects on surfaces.

A very wide range of alloys are used on additive manufacturing machines thanks to the availability of metal powders:

Steels such: 316L, 17-4PH, etc.

Nickel and cobalt base superalloys: 625, 718, CoCr F75, etc.

Titanium alloys: Ti6Al4V, CPTi, etc.

Aluminum alloys: AlSi10Mg etc.

But many other metals are also evaluated and developing:

copper alloys,

magnesium alloys,

precious metals such as gold, silver, platinum,

refractory metals such as Mo alloys, W and WC,

Metal Matrix Composites, etc.

Powder manufacturing processes

Metal powders for additive manufacturing are usually produced using the gas atomization process, where a molten metal stream is atomized thanks to a high-pressure neutral gas jet into small metal droplets thus forming metal powder particles after rapid solidification.

The gas atomization is a physical method (as opposed to chemical or mechanical methods) to obtain metal powders, like water atomization. But powders produced by gas atomization have a spherical shape, which is very beneficial for powder flowability while powders produced by water atomization will have an irregular shape.

The gas atomization is the most common process for additive manufacturing because it ensures:

A spherical powder shape

A good powder density, thanks to the spherical shape and particle size distribution

Good reproducibility of the particle size distribution

Besides a very wide range of alloys can be produced using the gas atomization process.

The gas atomization process

The gas atomization process starts with molten metal pouring from a tundish through a nozzle.

The stream of molten metal is then hit by jets of neutral gas such as nitrogen or argon and atomized into very small droplets which cool down and solidify when falling inside the atomization tower. Powders are then collected in a can.

The gas atomization process is the most common process to produce spherical metal powders for additive manufacturing. It is used in particular for steels, aluminum alloys, precious metals, etc.

The VIM gas atomization process

In the VIM gas atomization process, the melting takes place in a vacuum chamber. This process is recommended for superalloys so as to avoid in particular oxygen pick-up when working with alloys with reactive elements such as Ti and Al.

Other powder manufacturing processes

Some other powder manufacturing processes are used for specific alloys such as :

Plasma atomization and spheroidization consists of in-flight heating and melting thanks to a plasma torch of feed material followed by cooling and solidification under controlled conditions. Depending on processes, the raw material can be particles as well as bar or wire feedstock. Plasma atomization can be used in particular to spheroidise refractory metals such as Mo alloys, W and WC.

Centrifugal atomization, also known as plasma rotating electrode process, consists in melting with a plasma torch the end of a bar feedstock rotating at high speed and thus ejecting centrifugally the molten droplets of metal

Powder blending and mechanical alloying, to produce Metal Matrix Composites (MMCs)

 Metal powder characteristics for additive manufacturing

Key metal powder characteristics for additive manufacturing can be sorted into four main categories:

Chemical composition

Powder size distribution (PSD)


Physical properties

In all cases, there are several useful existing standards to determine methods for characterizing metal powders.

Additional points are important to consider when selecting metal powders for additive manufacturing processes:

Storage and aging of powders

Reusability of powder after additive manufacturing cycles

Health, safety, and environmental issues

Chemical composition

Regarding chemical composition, alloy elements and chosen measurement techniques (ICP, Spectrometry, etc.) are very important but it is also important to take into account:

interstitials, such as Oxygen, Nitrogen, Carbon, and Sulfur, to measure by combustion and fusion techniques

as well as trace elements and impurities,
as they may affect significantly material properties depending on alloys.

With the gas atomization process, all powder particles have the same chemical composition but finer particles tend to have a higher oxygen content due to the higher specific surface.

The chemical composition will influence in particular:

Melting temperature

Mechanical properties


Thermal properties (thermal conductivity, Heat capacity etc.)


Last, the chemical composition can also evolve slightly after multiple uses in additive manufacturing machines.

Particle size distribution

Depending on additive manufacturing technology and equipment, two main types of particle size distributions are considered:

powders usually below 50 microns for most powder bed systems. In this case, finer powder particles below 10 or 20 microns shall be avoided, as they are detrimental to the powder flowability.

powder between 50 and 100 to 150 µm for EBM and LMD technologies.

The Particle Size Distribution (PSD) is an index indicating what sizes of particles are present in what proportions i.e. the relative particle amount as a percentage of volume where the total amount of particles is 100 %) in the sample particle group to be measured.

The frequency distribution indicates in percentage the amounts of particles existing in respective particle size intervals whereas cumulative distribution expresses the percentage of the amounts of particles of specific particle size or below. Alternatively, cumulative distribution expresses the percentage of the amounts of particles below a certain size.

A common approach to defining the distribution width is to refer to three values on the x-axis (volume %):

the D10 i.e. the size where 10 percent of the population lies below D10

the D50, or median, ie the size where 50 percent of the population lies below D50

the D90, ie the size where 90 percent of the population lies below D90

Powder sampling is also an important point due to the powder segregation (applicable standard ASTM B215)

Usual methods and standards for particle size distribution measurement are:

ISO 4497 Metallic Powders, Determination of Particle Size by Dry Sieving (or ASTM B214 Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Metal Powders)

ISO 13320 Particle Size Analysis – Laser Diffraction Methods (or ASTM B822 Test Method for Particle Size Distribution of Metal Powders and Related Compounds by Light Scattering).

It is important to note that the PSD results will be dependent on the chosen test methods, which can provide different results, in particular, depending on powder morphologies.

The particle size distribution is a major point in additive manufacturing as it can influence many aspects such as:

Powder flowability and ability to spread evenly

Powder bed density

Energy input needed to melt the powder grains

Surface roughness


Powder morphology

The recommended particle morphology for additive manufacturing is spherical shape because it is beneficial for powder flowability and also to help to form uniform powder layers in powder bed systems.

The powder morphology can be observed by SEM (Scanning Electron Microscope).
Typical defects to be controlled and minimized are:

irregular powder shapes such as elongated particles

satellites which are small powder grains stuck on the surface of bigger grains

hollow powder particles, with open or closed porosity

Porosity content can be evaluated either by SEM observation or by Helium Pycnometry. The presence of excessive amounts of large pores or pores with entrapped gas can affect material properties.

Applicable standard: ASTM B923 Test Method for Metal Powder Skeletal Density by Helium or Nitrogen Pycnometry

Other powder physical properties

Rheological properties are very important for metal powders used in additive manufacturing equipment, both for powder handling from powder container to the working area and in the case of powder bed systems to form uniform layers of powders.

Rheology is a complex matter but some standard test methods are available, though not always fully appropriate for the particle sizes typical of additive manufacturing systems:

Density (apparent or tap)

Flow rate

Angle of repose


Applicable standards:

ISO 3923, Metallic powders — Determination of apparent density or ASTM B212 Test Method for Apparent Density of Free-Flowing Metal Powders Using the Hall Flowmeter Funnel

ISO 3953, Metallic powders — Determination of tap density or ASTM B527 Test Method for Determination of Tap Density of Metallic Powders and Compounds

ASTM B213 Test Methods for Flow Rate of Metal Powders Using the Hall Flowmeter Funnel

ISO 4324, Powders and granules — Measurement of the angle of repose

Other powder characteristics

Powder storage, handling, and aging. For almost all alloys, shielding gas, the control of hygrometry and temperature is important and strongly recommended.

Powder reusability, i.e. the definition of conditions of re-use of unused powders after additive manufacturing cycles (sieving of agglomerates, control, number of re-use, etc.)

Health, safety, and environmental issues


The material properties obtained with additive manufacturing processes are unique and specific of these technologies, due to the small melting pool and rapid solidification.

Mechanical properties of parts produced by additive manufacturing are usually:

superior to the properties obtained with the investment casting process

inferior or sometimes close to the conventional wrought part.

Key features of materials produced by additive manufacturing are:

The fine microstructure, due to the very rapid solidification process

A slight anisotropy in the Z direction, which induces slightly lower mechanical properties due to the superposition of layers. Anisotropy can be avoided in X and Y directions by using an adapted laser strategy.

A few small residual porosities, in particular below the surface. However, densities of 99.9% are commonly reached with additive manufacturing processes. To achieve full density, post-processing by HIP can be done, like for parts made by investment casting.

Specific defects in materials obtained with the additive manufacturing process

In case of incorrect process parameters, build strategy, part orientation or insufficient powder quality, some typical defects can be observed:

Unmolten powder particles

Lacks of fusion




Residual stresses

Poor surface roughness.

How to optimize process parameters to improve material properties?

To achieve high mechanical strength and adequate fatigue behavior, it is important to produce high-density parts with optimal surface quality and to minimize defects, through the optimization of process parameters. In this way, a working window is obtained with a defined set of laser parameters where parts with high densities and low roughness are guaranteed.

In laser processes, the Energy density (E) is a key factor:

sufficient energy density is needed to melt powder particles of the layer being processed and of the previous layer to assure a correct joining between successive layers and avoid lacks of fusion and porosity.

excessive energy can cause vaporization of the material creating defects and reducing material density.

The optimization of parameters shall be done both for the interior of the part and for the borders, where a good balance of minimized defects in the sub-surface and low roughness is pursued.

To optimize parameters, it is a common practice to manufacture simple geometries like cubes maintaining constant the power and varying the scanning speed in each cube, for given layer thickness and hatch spacing. Thus, each cube is manufactured with different energy density. Afterward, the cubes are characterized where interior density, sub-surface density, and roughness are determined, so as to identify the right energy density window and corresponding parameters

The example below with different laser parameters for H13 steel shows that at lowest energy densities lacks fusion and pores are generated.

When increasing the energy density the amount of porosity is increased considerably.

The optimum energy density to achieve the highest density is around 78 J/mm3.

The second example below with different laser parameters on an SLM machine for Ti6Al4V was achieved to optimize them
both for interior and borders.

Here, both interior and borders are practically free of defects when 40 J/mm3 energy density is surpassed.

In addition, not only the number of pores varies with energy density, but also the morphology of defects is different.

At low energy densities where the scanning speed is high, huge (> 100 µm) and irregular defects are found in the samples due to partial melting of the particles which induces a defective powder deposition.

At high energy densities with low scanning speeds, the pores are spherical and small (<100 μm) due to gases trapped in the melt pool.

The defect and material density analyses were completed with roughness measurements. The lowest roughness values (~10-12 μm) ensuring improved surface quality, are obtained at low energy densities (< 30 J/mm3 ). However, in these conditions, the sub-surface porosity is too high. Increasing slightly the energy density up to 30 J/mm3 the roughness is still low and pores in the subsurface are reduced significantly.

At higher energy densities, although the number of pores is minimal near the surface, the roughness gets worse. It can be concluded in this example that energy densities superior to 40 J/mm3 are necessary to obtain parts with 99.7- 99.9% relative density, whereas an energy density of 30 J/mm3
is enough to have both improved surface quality and minimized defects in borders.

Design guidelines for laser beam melting

Basic design rules

These design guidelines are relevant only for laser beam melting (i.e selective laser melting) and not for EBM nor for LMD.

AM technologies offer unique possibilities regarding part design and possible geometries.

The example of the platform below is useful to help to evaluate the machine capability for many geometrical features such as:

Holes and internal channels

Recommended minimum standard hole size is currently 0.4mm. Holes and channels with a diameter below 10 mm usually do not require support structures. But for diameters above 10 mm, support structures are needed, which can be difficult to remove in the case of nonlinear channels. To avoid support structures in this case, a possible option is to modify the channel profile, as can be seen below with the example below of an ellipse profile minimizing overhang area.

Another approach can be to integrate functionally the supports so as to avoid removing them.

Minimum wall thicknesses

Recommended minimum wall thickness is usually 0.2 mm. But it can vary depending on the machine, powder used and material. If wall sections are too thin or not supported, then there is a chance of buckling in the surface as can be seen on the example of a Ni718 manifold below.

The part is fully dense but due to the large part diameter of what the 200-micron thick wall section cannot support itself. In this case, the wall section needs to be thickened to avoid buckling effect.

Maximum length-to-height ratio

The length-to-height ratio shall usually not exceed 8:1.

In the example of bike frame component below, the length-to-height ratio was too great. In a second iteration, a lattice support structure was installed to avoid part distortion.

But if the part has a reasonable section or supporting geometry, then it is possible to build at a higher width-to-height as can be seen in the example below.

Minimum strut diameter and lattice structures

Minimum strut diameter is usually 0.15 mm. Thanks to this unique design possibility offered by powder bed AM technologies, complex lattice structures can be achieved, impossible to produce by any other technologies.

Lattice structures offer the major advantage of reducing part weight without reducing part strength, which is very important in industries such as aerospace and transportation.

Part orientation

The orientation of parts in the powder bed is a key point of attention both for quality and cost. Indeed, part orientation influences the build time, the quantity of supports, the surface roughness and residual stresses.

Finding the best suitable part orientation helps to achieve:

the shortest build time ie minimizing the number of layers and part height

the minimal amount of supports an easy access to support so that they can be easily removed

the best possible surface roughness and minimal staircase effect

the minimum level of residual stresses which can lead to part distortion


An important rule when building part layer by layer is to avoid having a too low overhang angle because each new welding seam must be supported at least partly by the previous welding seam in the previous layer. When the angle between the part and the build platform is below 45°, support structures are needed to avoid poor surface roughness as well as distortion and warping leading to build failure as can be seen on the photo below.

The poor surface roughness is the result of building directly onto the loose powder instead of using the support structure as a building scaffold. In this case, the area melted at the focal point cools very quickly and the stress generated curls the material upwards. Supports would act as an anchor to the build plate tying parts down to the plate in order to avoid upward curl. Besides, the very poor surface consists of melted and partially melted/sintered powder because of the laser penetrates the powder bed and starts to agglomerate loose powder particles surrounding the focal point instead of dissipating the excessive heat through the support structure.

The warping and curled area can also cause build failure if higher than the desired profile because it prevents spreading a new layer of powder.


Support structures have several functions:

support the part in case of overhangs,

strengthen and fix the part to the building platform,

conduct excess heat away,

prevent warping or complete build failure.

Besides, optimized supports shall be easy to remove mechanically and have minimal weight. The position and the orientation of the part on the build platform have a significant impact on the need and nature of support structures, hence on the quality of the built and the post-processing operations.

Below are some examples of different support structures on a simple part, based on different part positions and orientations. In some cases, removing the supports can be impossible, even though it is the best option in terms of processing. Besides, many designs of support structures are possible.

The design of supports shall be optimized to achieve the above functions and shall also to be easy to remove mechanically after the laser beam melting operation.

In the impeller example below by Fraunhofer IFAM, two support designs have been evaluated:

tree supports with many struts

wall supports with one wall for each blade

In this example, the wall support proved better both for post-processing and for improved stability during manufacture.

Surface roughness

With laser beam melting, achievable surface roughness (Rz) is usually between 25 and 40 µm in the as-built state. Polishing helps to reach much lower values as can be seen on the table below. But important to remember is that part design complexity may affect its ability to be polished efficiently.

Typical surface defects to be avoided are:

The staircase effect, which can be observed on a curved surface and is more pronounced when the surface angle increases vs. vertical axis.

Poor down-skin surface roughness and decreased dimension accuracy, which is linked primarily to the fact that the heat generated by the laser beam does not evacuate quickly on down-facing surfaces

Thermal stress and warping

Warping is due to thermal stresses caused by rapid solidification.
Warping can lead to part distortion, bad junctions between supports and components or recoating problems.

Design optimization for AM technology


To take full advantage of AM design possibilities, it is important to redesign conventional parts. Design optimization can be done in several directions:

Reduce the total number of parts

Design for functionality

Design parts to be multifunctional


Topological optimization

Design for ease of fabrication.

The example below shows a redesign case study of a solar panel deployer for satellites aiming at reducing drastically the number of parts and total weight.

The initial design manufactured by conventional technology is a mechanical assembly of 25 separate parts. The systemic approach of DFAM led to a patented 3 parts solution which provides not only a reduction of part number but also of the weight (5 times lighter) and size of the assembly.

Topology optimization

To take into account all AM design possibilities and limitations, the first step is to reduce the part into its basic functional requirements (such as functional surfaces, load-case, etc.). This step allows the designer to only focus on the requirements and prevents him from limiting his design, hence maximizing the possible improvements. This can be especially interesting when dealing with assemblies (or even entire products).

From the functional requirements, the minimal volume of material is then placed in order to link the surfaces and to sustain the load case (be it mechanical, thermal, coupled, etc). This second step is usually achieved by using topology optimization tools that suggest geometries able to sustain the loads while keeping the volume to a minimum.

The last step is to redesign the optimized volume in order to cope with the manufacturing constraints (such as angular orientation, machine dimensions, machining allowances, etc).

Since Topology Optimization leads to noisy geometries, caused by tesselation, it is usually necessary to implement model reconstruction and smooth as can be seen in figures below. This step can be very time-consuming, especially if the load cases that were used during the optimization are very specific and do not take into account some steps of the product life cycle (such as machining which can require high rigidity).

case studies


Borescope bosses for A320neo Geared TurbofanTM engine

Industry user sector: Aerospace Industry

Material: Nickel alloy 718

Part dimensions: Volume: 15.600 mm³

LxBxH Boundary Box: 42x72x36 mm

Additive process used: Laser Beam Melting

The bosses are made by selective laser melting (SLM) on an EOS machine.

They form part of MTU’s low-pressure turbine case and allow the blading to be inspected at specified intervals for wear and damage using a borescope.

Benefits of AM technology

Series production of up to 2000 parts per year.

Lower development production lead-times and lower production costs.

Suitable for producing parts in materials that are difficult to machine, as, for example, nickel alloys.

For complex components that are extremely difficult, if not impossible to manufacture using conventional methods.

Tool-free manufacturing and less material consumption.

Support to satellite antenna

Industry user sector: Aerospace

Material: Ti6Al4V

Part height and weight: 380 mm, 3.3 kg

Additive process used: Electron Beam Melting

Part made by EBM with the optimized design thanks to topology optimization

Benefits of AM technology

Weight reduction: 55%

RSC Emission Rake

Industry user sector: Aerospace / Experimental research

Material: Inconel 718

Part dimensions: 270 mm x 80 mm x 180 mm

Part weight: 2.0 kg

Additive process used: Laser Beam Melting

The water-cooled emission rake is placed into the exhaust duct of a high-pressure combustion facility. It is used to sample hot exhaust gases using 6 sampling tubes and supplies the gas to an analyzing system. It can sample gas at temperatures of 2100°C and a maximum pressure of 45 bar. The part was produced on a laser causing M2 machine by Concept Laser.

Benefits of AM technology

Manufacturing of all components and details in one single step (fast manufacturing)

Additional design freedom (individual cooling geometries, conical and helical sampling tubes,…)

Cost saving up to 60% compared to a conventionally manufactured rake for similar use

Repair of worn lips on a labyrinth seal

Industry user sector: Aerospace

Material: Nickel alloy 718, Nickel alloy 713, Waspaloy, Ti6242

Additive process used: Laser Metal Deposition

This engine’s part is turning at 30 000 RPM. After 10 000 hours of flight, the different lips of the parts are worn and do not guarantee the efficiency of the seal. With the LMD process, it was possible to rebuild the different worn lips.

Benefits of AM technology

Repair of parts that were impossible to repair up to now

Certification for 5 repair cycles: lifetime extended from 10 000 to 60 000 hours

Material savings


Burner repair

Industry user sector: Energy

Material: Nickel alloy HX

Additive process used: Laser Beam Melting

Customized EOSINT M 280 machine for precise, cost-effective, and faster repair of worn burner tips of gas turbines exposed to extreme temperatures.

Benefits of AM technology

Time required for the repair process of burner tips has fallen by more than 90%

Old burner versions can quickly be brought up to the latest standards of technology

Potential cost reductions were already seen at an early stage

Vacuum permeator

Industry user sector: Energy (fusion), Science Industry

Material: Stainless steel (AISI 316L)

Part weight & dimensions: 2 kg, 10x10x20 cm

Additive process used: Laser Beam Melting

Part of a bigger system (designed and assembled by SENER) to demonstrate the possibility of tritium recovery in fusion reactors. Its manufacturing entailed various challenges: component dimensions, geometric changes along its section, metallurgical, file handling.

Benefits of AM technology

Geometry impossible to produce by a conventional manufacturing process


Removable Partial Denture (RPD) Framework

Industry user sector: Dental

Material: Cobalt Chrome (ASTM F75)

Part dimensions: 60 x 30 x 0.5 mm, 15 g

Additive process used: Laser Beam Melting

The part is a metal framework for a removable partial denture (RPD). When fully assembled, the RPD is a denture for a partially edentulous dental patient. 3D data retrieved directly from the patient’s mouth.

Benefits of AM technology

The conventional manufacturing of cast frameworks involves a lot of work and time

AM is faster and has a high volume output, more accurate and parts have high strength.

Hearing aid

Industry user sector: Biomedical

Material: Ti6Al4V ELI (grade 23)

Part height: 15 mm

Additive process used: Laser Beam Melting

Benefits of AM technology

High accuracy

High biocompatibility

High mechanical resistance

High flexibility of manufacturing

Cranial implant

Industry user sector: Medical

Material: Titanium alloy

Part dimensions: 12 x 8 cm

Additive process used: Laser Beam Melting

Development and manufacture of a customized and precision-fit implant with high permeability for liquids and perfect heat dissipation on an EOSINT M 280 machine

Benefits of AM technology

Impact is stable yet permeable for liquids because of its porosity of 95%

lattice structures protect against heat and support in-growth of bone tissue

Cleanable Filter Disc

Industry user sector: Medical Instruments

Material: Stainless Steel 316L

Part dimensions: Ø55mm

Additive process used: Laser Beam Melting

Traditional methods of creating filters often result in gaps between the securing steel ring and the mesh, as well as the weft and warp strands of the woven wire. Known as ‘bug traps’, these can quickly gather bacteria and dirt.

By using additive manufacturing, CAM removed these bug traps from the design, meaning the filters can be cleaned much more easily, decreasing downtime for the customer, as well as the requirement for replacement parts.

Benefits of AM technology

No recesses in part compared with conventional woven wire mesh equivalent

Less contamination through a particulate build up

Easier to clean to a high standard, decreasing customer downtime, and costs

Design size can be easily altered to suit customer requirements, including a change in aperture size, without the creation of new tooling


Pressure sensor house

Industry user sector: Industry Application

Material: Stainless steel 316L

Part dimensions: 50x12x12mm

Additive process used: Precision inkjet on powder bed

Pressure sensor house printed with membrane, threads and internal features for the electronics

Benefits of AM technology

All machining operations joining and assembly were eliminated.

Internal features that are hard to obtain with other technologies

Design for service

Tool insert for die casting

Industry user sector: Die-casting

Material: Stainless Steel 316L

Part weight: 150g

Additive process used: Laser Beam Melting

Connector blocks used in the Gripple wire joining system are manufactured using die-casting, the internal cavities being formed by mold tool inserts. To facilitate the rapid evaluation of new design concepts, a series of tool inserts were manufactured using direct metal laser sintering, with up to 12 unique designs produced in a single build. Post-build finishing was then performed to produce the surface finish required for the die-casting process. This dramatically reduced the lead times associated with obtaining tool inserts compared to traditional machining.

Benefits of AM technology

The ability to make each insert different allowed many more designs to be evaluated.

Quick turnaround times dramatically shortened the development program

Tooling insert

Industry user sector: Tooling

Material: Maraging Steel

Part dimensions: 35 x 20 cm

Additive process used: Laser Beam Melting

Inserts with conformal cooling channels to produce arm-rests for cars, built on EOSINT M 270 machine. Optimize the cooling process to reduce the production cycle period, improve component quality and increase maintenance intervals.

Benefits of AM technology

Production plant maintenance extended from every 2 weeks to every 5-6

Uniform cooling prevents deformation of the plastic end product

Costs are lowered through a 17% cut in cycle time

Conformal cooling channel in mold/nozzle etc.

Industry user sector: Moldmaking

Material: Ti-6Al-4V

Part dimensions: Outline: 80 mm dia. x 100 mm H

Channel volume/length : approx. 5000 mm3 / 1 meter L

Additive process used: Laser Beam Melting Complicated cooling channel can be installed inside of parts by AM with 3D design data.

Benefits of AM technology

Higher reproducibility of complicated cooling channel network inside of parts with utilizing of 3D design data

Freedom in 3D design for cooling channel network in accordance with thermal loading in each location

Flexible shape/dimension/location of a cross section in the cooling channel network design

Automotive and Car Racing

Prototype of heat exchanger

Industry user sector: Motorsport

Material: Al Si 10Mg

Additive process used: Laser Beam Melting

New design with self-supporting integrated cooling fins on outside surfaces and turbulators inside cooling tubes to disrupt the flow of the cooled fluid. Produced on an EOS M290 machine.

Benefits of AM technology

Maximum heat transfer

Compact and scalable design

F1 Roll Hoop

Industry user sector: Motorsport, F1

Material: Ti6Al4V

Part weight & dimensions: 2.6kg, 370mm long

Additive process used: Electron Beam Melting

The impact structure used to protect the driver in the event of a roll over the incident is traditionally made by investment casting. In order to meet stringent weight targets, material needs to be removed from low stressed regions. AM has the advantage of being able to produce these complex designs with a very short lead time. This novel design was produced by Dash-CAE and manufactured at the University of Sheffield’s Mercury Centre. The part had to be sectioned such that it could fit within the building envelope of the AM process. These sections were then welded together and the completed hoop integrated into a chassis for testing.

Benefits of AM technology

The short lead times enabled the F1 team to swiftly take a new design concept through to manufacture and testing.

Weight saving over castings due to more complex design.

Consumer goods

Platinum hollow charms

Industry user sector: Jewellery

Material: 950 ‰ Platinum powder alloy

Part dimensions: 31 parts of 2,8g each (2,4 g after polishing)

Additive process used: Laser Beam Melting

Platinum has always been difficult to use with casting. With SLM technique it’s possible to match its fashion effect with the maximum freedom of shape, also preserving light weights to let it be it affordable.

Benefits of AM technology

Hollow parts cost less than full parts made by cheaper material

Maximum customization for exclusive jewelry

Eco-friendly production process

Rygo sculpture

Industry user sector: Fashion & Design

Material: Stainless Steel 316L

Part dimensions: 25x25x30 mm

Additive process used: Precision inkjet on powder bed

Bathsheba Grossman is an artist recognized for her 3d printed art and sculptures. Not many of her complex designs can be produced in any other way than additive manufacturing

Benefits of AM technology

High level of resolution and surface quality

Effective mass customization of designs

Possible to achieve very thin walls and sections